Law & Order – Yelm Ordinances

Law & Order in Yelm

Introduction: Yelm incorporated in 1924 and the town council soon began passing ordinances. Here are some summarized selections from Yelm’s long list of ordinances.

1925 – Regulation of pool halls and card rooms – A license is required to own or regulate a pool hall or card room. License fee is $25 a year.  Punishment: $10-100 fine plus imprisonment until paid, not exceeding 50 days.

1925 – Prohibit stock from running at large – No livestock allowed at large within Yelm city limits. Duty of Marshall to impound all animals found. Release of animal will cost $2.50, plus an additional $1.00 for any extra day the animal is held (12 hours required). After ten days of being held, the Marshall can sell, at a public sale, for cash.

1925 – To preserve public morality, peace, and the safety of Yelm. It shall be unlawful for any person to be found:

  1. Fighting or engaging in disorderly conduct and use of profane or abusive language;
  2. Carrying a concealed weapon;
  3. Drawing weapons upon another with intent to intimidate or annoy;
  4. Discharging weapons within city limits or use of other explosives without permission from the City Council;
  5. Slandering others that produces a disturbance of the peace; or to challenge another to a fight;
  6. Agreeing to fight, except for athletic or boxing contests sanctioned by an official club or organization;
  7. Making boisterous noises after 10 p.m.;
  8. Being a common drunkard, beggar, run away, or idle and dissolute person;
  9. Being a known thief;
  10. Under the influence of opium or soliciting alms;
  11. Engaging in prostitution;
  12. Being found with a prostitute;
  13. Seeking a prostitute;
  14. Loitering for soliciting prostitution;
  15. Owning or operating a house for prostitution;
  16. Living in a house of prostitution;
  17. Exposing themselves indecently;
  18. Habitually playing games of chance or profit;
  19. Gambling or owning gambling devices;
  20. Establishing a place for gambling or holding a lottery;
  21. Wagering anything of value, such as roulette, poker, etc.;
  22. Acting in a suspicious manner beyond 11 p.m. outdoors;
  23. Collecting or congregating in public crowds;
  24. Obstructing public road or sidewalk traffic by standing or loitering;
  25. Watching or staging cockfights or fights with other animals;
  26. Establishing a cockfighting arena;
  27. Exposing poison to man or animal;
  28. Defacing public or private property;
  29. Destroying public or private property;
  30. Destroying street signs or advertisements;
  31. Altering city of Yelm Bulletin Boards, unless you are an employee of the city;
  32. Spitting on the street, sidewalk, or other public conveyances;
  33. Selling tobacco to persons under the age of 21 years;
  34. Impersonating a police officer;
  35. Opposing arrest by an officer or annoying an officer;
  36. Rescuing a person from prison;
  37. Refusing to aid a police officer in an arrest for males 18 years of age or older;
  38. Mischievously throwing objects at any person and or their belongings to annoy;
  39. Messing with water mains, gas pipes, or electric wire without permission;
  40. Loitering or playing pool or billiards in a billiard room if you are under the age of 21 years;
  41. Posting signs on trees or public posts, tying animals to trees or posts, or damaging a tree or post without permission;
  42. Injuring or destroying any flower, foliage, or shrubbery on property not his;
  43. Emptying debris on public roads or sidewalks, such as, paper, nails, broken glass, bottles, garbage, etc.;
  44. Driving on sidewalk without a special permit from the City Council;
  45. Polluting or interfering with public spring or fountain;
  46. Preventing the use of evidence in any case.

Punishment: Violation of above is deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and will be subject to a fine not exceeding $100 or by imprisonment not exceeding 30 days, or both.

1927 – Preservation of public morals, peace, safety, and good order.
It shall be unlawful for:

  1. Any priest or rabbi found in possession of any intoxicating liquor;
  2. Any person maintaining a storage for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. Punishment: $25 to $100 fine, or jail to not exceed 30 days. If you fail to pay the fine, one is deemed to work on public streets at the rate of $3 a day until all fines are paid.

1928 – Operation of municipal water system.

  1. Nobody can sell water without a permit;
  2. No water-transport methods constructed without permit;
  3. Monthly rates:
    3,000 gallons or less…..$1.50
    3,000-4,000 gallons……. 1.90
    4,000-5,000 gallons……. 2.20
    5,000-6,000 gallons……. 2.40
    Installation services……15.00
    Outside Yelm limits,
    Under 3,000 gallons……. 2.00

1928 Amendment to Ordinance No. 23
An addition of .30 cents per thousand dollars of water is to be added to people receiving water outside of Yelm limits, and an addition of .15 cents per thousand gallons is to be added to people receiving more than 6,000 gallons of water, per month.

1929 Control of Unlicensed Radio Broadcasting

  1. It is unlawful to operate any apparatus that interferes with radio broadcasting or reception between 2 p.m. and midnight.
  2. Devices include violet ray machines, open or quenched spark machines, machines using Telsa Coil or principle, X-ray machines, or other devices that produce high frequency oscillations.
  3. This law does not apply to radio stations, who are licensed by federal government or those employed in interstate communication.

Punishment: Fine not exceeding $100, or 30 days in jail.

1936 Prohibition of punch boards
It shall be unlawful for any person found:

  1. Maintaining a vending machine, punch board, manual game automatic game, or skill game;

Punishment: Persons found guilty are subject to a maximum fine of $100 or 90 days in jail.
“Therefore it is hereby ordained that an emergency exists and this ordinance shall take effect immediately.”

1938 To regulate and control the licensing of any marble game

  1. One person must have a license to operate game that takes skill, whether or not a fee is charged;
  2. The license will cost $5.00 for each game per month and all fees are to be paid one month in advance.
  3. License must be posted in a conspicuous place, under glass, on top of each game.

1945 Volunteer firemen’s relief and pension fund

  1. Enactment of Volunteer Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund will proved relief and compensation for injured volunteer and retirees;
  2. Maximum membership is limited to 20 people per 1,000 population of the town.

1954 Ordinance relating to abandoned, unused or discarded ice boxes

  1. It is unlawful to leave an ice box with a lid equipped with a snap lock in an unattended area;

Punishment: Such a crime is deemed a misdemeanor and all persons will be subject to a fine not exceeding $100, or 30 days in jail, or both.
Furthermore, each day constitutes a separate offense.

1953 Adoption of 1954 budget
Estimated Revenues

Current Expenses
Taxes: 10 mills $3,296.20
Licenses $300.00
Liquor revenues $2,166.72
Police court fines $1,254.48
Additional expenses $4,302.72
Total $11,320.12

 

Water Funds
Consumer collections $7,200.00
Hook-ups $50.00
Balances on hand $1,500.00
Other expenses $9,113.09

Grand total of all estimated revenues for 1954 $29183.21

Estimated Expenditures

Current Expense
Marshall salary $3,600.00
Marshall expense $1,000.00
Jail expense and meals $150.00
State Auditor $250.00
Outlay-Police Department $1,670.00
Street fund $2,672.49
Water fund $11,600.00
Garbage fund $2,800.00
Other expenditures $8,240.72

Grand total of estimated expenditures for 1954 $29,183.21

Leisure Activities During the Depression in Yelm

Leisure Activities During the Depression in Yelm

In 1929, the stock market crashed leaving “over 9,000 American banks either went bankrupt of closed their doors to avoid bankruptcy between 1930 and 1933. Depositors lost over $2.5 billion in deposits.” This left 25% of Americans without a job, and unemployment never went below 15 percent until World War II. Of those who did not lose their jobs, “one-third of the work force experienced cuts in wages and hours both.” Not only the city workers, but also the agricultural community felt the hit. “Farm income declined by 50 percent between 1929 and 1932. A third of all American farmers lost land.” The government realized this atrocity and began to help. “The West received more federal grants per capita through New Deal relief programs than any other region” (US). This meant a family of five received $53 per year, and a single person received $15 in 1933 (Washington’s Emergency Relief). With the end of the economic boom of the 1920s, Americans spending changed, changing the lives of people all over the country. This brought the people of America and Yelm closer to their family and made them more creative. Some of the luxuries they could enjoy during the twenties, such as leisure activities, were not the same.

The children were probably most creative of all; the innocence of their youth could not realize the weight of the period. The youngsters would ride their “’wheels’, (not bikes)” to Olympia for ice cream sodas at noon and home for supper (Yelm his). Roger Eide and wife Lila when asked to remember the fun of their childhood remember playing “kick the can,” “swimming, “ skating up and down the street,” and wagons.” A common meeting place was Patterson Lake, between Yelm and Lacey; there was a skating rink there. They also say “kids” would play a lot of pranks such as tipping outhouses, soaping windows on cars and business buildings. The children were probably the least affected mentally by the Great Depression. They continued to play and being inventive to occupy the time.

Group activities were very popular during the Depression. People could relax, and forget about the hard times, or they could talk about their difficulties. The most common group past time was probably Baseball. People all over America and in Yelm played baseball quite frequently. Every chance they got; they would get together to play. Games would start up within families at picnics, with friends at school, and there were small community leagues as well. Lila Eide recalls a Roy team and a Yelm team would play near Lawrence Lake.

Another sport available was golf. There was a league at Lackamas (NVN). Other group activities for groups were ice cream socials, camping, fishing, hunting, and berry picking (Yelm his). And of course this would all lead to “lots of parties.” There were berry balls, street dances and carnivals to celebrate (Eide). Group activities were always available and were used to bring communities together.

Families were another important social structure. People would gather on Sundays or after work to relax and reflect. One home activity was reading. It became popular because the harshness of the Great Depression came through in the words. Roger Eide remembers doing a lot of “home things” including reading, and the radio. He believed that “people would sit and listen to the radio and the read probably more the average person” today. Radio provided Americans with their first direct access to important public events (us). Eide said his family listened to the “radio all the time” there were comedy programs, ball games, soap operas (which his mother listened to quite frequently), and music. Music consisted of “bands playing, horns and pianos, Lawrence Welk, and occasionally classical.” Radio plays were among the “most popular entertainments of the 1930s” (us). People would sit together on their front porches, and sit, talk, and dance. It seems like a solitary experience, but it turned into a community activity. The radio was an important part of American culture throughout the Depression.

Another experience all Yelmites could enjoy was going to the movies. Movies were one of the least expensive forms of entertainment, and with sound and soon color become very popular very quickly (us). Movies could be seen for 10 cents and the high school. And a man opened a theater on southwest corner of First Street and Yelm Avenue, the Eides remember. They said it was “some old garage” but then moved to where the bowling alley now is. It soon gave way to the more popular, future drive-ins and TV. Yelmites went to the theater to escape their everyday lives, and found themselves connecting to the rest of the nation.

Even though money was scarce, Yelmites and Americans in general found economic ways to entertain themselves.

 

By Mary Asher

 

Sources

  • “Washington’s Emergency Relief Administration, Director’s Files, Plans & Reports, 1993”
  • Robert Wolf interview
  • Roger and Lila Eide interview
  • Nisqually Valley News, May 22, 1935
  • The Story of Yelm 1848-1948

Pranks and Crime in the Thirties

Pranks and Crime in the Thirties

In the 1930s, the range of crime and pranks committed by Yelm citizens was much more limited than it is now. The only crime reported by Yelm Citizens interviewed by the Yelm History Project was speeding and a few robberies, but nothing as serious as it is now. The extent of the pranks was also very limited and only involved dismantling woodpiles and tipping over outhouses. These pranksters would then return the next day and help the owners rebuild the piles and return the outhouses to their upright positions. This probably reflects the overall good will people harbored towards each other in the ’30s. Residents reported a large difference between the general goodwill people held towards each other back then, and the bad feelings people harbor nowadays. During the depression people held a higher concern for each other’s wellbeing due to the extreme poverty caused by the depression.

The crime committed in Yelm was much less destructive in nature than it is now, consisting mostly of speeding and a few robbery offenses. Interviewees reported a decrease in speeding only after the Yelm deputies acquired vehicles that could out speed or even catch-up with the speeding culprits. Yelm Deputies were notorious for giving speeding tickets only to out-of-towners in an attempt to boost the local economy. There is no evidence that this technique ever actually boosted the local economy, but the interviewees were certainly not complaining.

(Source: Yelm History Project interviews)

Yelm and the New Deal

Yelm and the New Deal

The sudden depression that followed the “Roaring Twenties” sent the United States spiraling in to a state of complete uncertainty. Instead of the average citizen having more time and money than they knew how to spend, they now had almost no money and spent their time looking for whatever available jobs they could find. Because of these unexpected and horrific circumstances, the government was in need of some adequate solutions, and fast. The result was the launching of the New Deal by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This program dealt with many of the problems facing the nation on both an agricultural and industrial level. Thanks to the New Deal, the nation was soon well on it’s way back to the comfortable lifestyle that it once knew. Surprising as it may be, our little town of Yelm did not escape joining the nation in this particular crisis, nor was it left out of the programs that helped this nation recover.

Yelm experienced all the mainstream problems that plagued the nation during the depression. Unemployment was obviously high, and even those who were employed made very meager amounts to live on. Bob Wolf’s family owned the local grocery store and he said that they extended enormous amounts of credit as well as being involved in “…bartering and exchanging food, but not a lot of cash was involved.” His mother wrote in his baby book, “The banks have crashed. We’ve lost everything that we had in the banks…we’ll never get that back.” It was a time of despair for the entire country and the situation was no different in the prairie town of Yelm.

The economy of Yelm during the depression was certainly reflective of the country as a whole. The decline in gross returns of the prominent berry industry that was a major economic influence in the district is evidence of the crisis as it occurred in Yelm. Despite the fact that in 1931 the district was estimated to have produced twice as many berries as in 1928, the gross return in ‘31 was notably less than the $35,000 revenue from ’28, as it produced a mere $30,000. Furthermore, property tax rates reflect the declining Yelm economy as well. The following chart shows the funds received by Yelm High School from levies on property taxes from the beginning of the depression to the very height of it.

1929 $22,875
1930 $25,225
1931 $20,145
1932 $21,354
1933 $21,170
1934 $15,480
1935 $16,769
1936 $14,536

As you can see the funding dropped dramatically over the first few years of the decade. That decline compounded with the fact that the needed funds for the year 1936 were approximately $15,605, and the district actually received $14,536 led to the demands of the superintendent for a new levy in ‘37. In all actuality, the fact was that property values had severely declined as a result of the national depression and there simply was no money for the schools, or for anything else.

The New Deal brought a new sense of hope for many Americans. Early New Deal developments included the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1933. This set new standards for labor such as a minimum wage of $.30-$.40/hour, a standard work week set at 35-40 hours/week, and laws prohibiting child labor. This was great news for those who were fortunate enough to be employed. The Public Works Administration monitored and stabilized government spending. This was a helpful development considering that many theories attributed the unstable spending of the government to the numerous causes of the depression. The Glass-Steagal Act set up the FDIC and guaranteed up to $2500 of money invested in banks, which would prevent many tragic cases like that of the Wolf family in the future. All of these developments were fundamental in restoring faith in the government in its future endeavors. However, the people realized that, while in the future these developments would be incredibly stabilizing, the problem remained that people were poor, starving and in need of help right now.

The result was the series of work relief programs that would follow during the larger part of the 1930’s. Many of the programs implemented were focused on the immediate recovery of the economy. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was a program that focused on re-growing and preserving the forest and was geared toward young men in somewhat urbanized areas. The CCC was present in Yelm in the form of a camp on the outskirts of Rainier. This site was funded by the government and employed a number of men from the area. In 1936 the farmers in the Yelm area were offered a chance for rehabilitation. Farmers were allowed to apply to the County Relief Agency for “temporary subsistence grants” until they could get their farms back at a profitable level. Also offered was a way to stabilize their farms and make them profitable by adjusting their debts and giving them loans for the goods needed to do it. Another program that was implemented in the early 30’s was the National Youth Administration (NYA) whose primary concern was the education of the youth of America. They sought to provide the necessary funds for students to continue the pursuit of their education. In Yelm the NYA presented many opportunities for the small farm town where children were needed to maintain the crops during this time of crisis. In fact, in 1935 the Nisqually Valley News reported that the government would be providing Yelm High School with $100 a month which would be given out to students whom the district felt were worthy and in need of it. Any student over the age of 16 was able to receive up to $6 per month and were required to do some type of designated job in order to earn the much needed money. Many students were able to remain in school because of this program in Yelm. Other types of relief programs available in Yelm and the rest of the nation included Mother’s Pensions and welfare programs with very specific income requirements. These programs helped tremendously in the area of Yelm; however, the biggest aid during the depression came from the many government-funded jobs that were implemented by the Works Progress Administration (WPA).

The WPA was a larger version of the preceding Civil Works Administration (CWA). The CWA was a government-funded program that provided civilians with employment on government projects such as roads, bridges, dams, etc. The much broader WPA was apparent in many cases in Yelm. The government-funded Yelm Irrigation project, which focused on increasing the capacity of the main canal, was estimated to have employed around 25 men for 10 months in 1935. In November of that same year the government provided necessary funds for the $16,500 Yelm creek project. The goal of this project was to decrease the amount of flooding that was prevalent during the winter as well as providing work for 20-40 men over a period of 6 months. The $9,350 Yelm city streets project was commenced close to the same time. This project was designed to employ 12 men to finish making concrete sidewalks on Yelm’s main avenue and to improve the gravel sidewalks on the side streets of Yelm. All of these programs were essential in the recovery of the Yelm economy and the national crisis as a whole.

The impact of the depression on the economy of the United States is undeniable. The vast decline in employment, income, and the standard of living portrayed the immense crisis that plagued the nation and that certainly did not exclude Yelm. The New Deal programs implemented by Roosevelt were incredibly helpful in directing the nation toward recovery. In Yelm, programs such as the CCC, the NYA, and the many opportunities for welfare assistance were particularly helpful. Overall, though, the WPA was absolutely imperative in sending the city of Yelm back toward recovery. The experiences of Yelm with the depression and the New Deal were certainly reflective of the experiences of the nation as a whole.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yelm Irrigation District


History of the Yelm Irrigation District
by Georgia Justman

 Introduction:  The following was given to the city of Yelm by the Justman family.  In this account, written after World War II, Georgia Justman examines the history of the Yelm Irrigation District, including its relationship to the McKenna Lumber Company.
 
The Yelm Irrigation system was originally built by the Yelm Irrigation Company, composed of landowners on Yelm Prairie.  The water right was filed by L.N. . Rice, James Mosman and Tom Chambers for 100 c.f.s. and is on file in the State Department of conservation and Development, State of Washington.  The main canal to the Prairie was completed in 1916 and the lateral system in 1917.  The Yelm Irrigation District was organized in November and a bond issue of $250,000 was voted in January 1918 and the irrigation system purchased from the Irrigation Company for $143,000 of which $53,000 was paid in cash and $100,000 in bonds at 90%.

    The water for this project was diverted from the Nisqually River about 12 miles above the upper end of the project.  Diversion was made by a brush and rock weir across the river.  This was very costly and was in grave danger of being swept away by extreme high water.  In 1941 funds were allocated for the reconstruction of the diversion dam at the intake on the river.

    The main, or diversion, canal originally consisted of 9.25 mils of wood flume, 4×8 feet.

The development of the Yelm Irrigation District was closely related to the lumbering operation in the vicinity.  The first settlers in the district were laborers in the McKenna Lumber Mill.  It started March 1, 1908 and operated continually until July 7, 1930.  The company carried on logging operations and manufactured lumber, shingles and lath.  The capacity of the plant was 200,000 board feet a day.  375 men were employed for one shift.  The plant operated 2 shifts part time.  At the time the Company quit operation there was still enough timber for another 20 years.  The faced 3 options. 

                    1. Pay less for stumpage
                    2. Cut wages for labor
                    3. Shut down

They shut down for 2 years and hoped for better operating conditions but nothing changed so they began to liquidate the plant in 1932.  In 1942 when the report was written, it was still going on.

In 1911, 3 years after starting the mill, the two presidents of the McKenna Mill become interested in developing an irrigation district on the Yelm Prairie.  The Company had acquired several hundred acres of land on the Yelm Prairie and hired L.N. Rice of [The Engineering]Company of Seattle to subdivide the land into 5-15 Acre [   acts].  On the Justman land deeds it says McKenna irrigated tracts lot 6 A and 6 B etc.

The McKenna Land Company sold land to their employees so they could make part of their living on the farms.  The sold the land with no down payment, furnished lumber to build their house and barns and some assistance to buy cattle, hogs and chickens.  The company hired a full-time farmer to instruct people how to farm.

Arthur and Esther Justman moved to Yelm in 1920 and bought 20 acres from McKenna Land Company.

A. J. Justman worked as Night Depot agent in Tacoma for the Railroad and also was the Manager of the Olympic Ice Cream Company in Tacoma so this made him experienced in running an office and handling large sums of money.

We know A. J. Justman was Director on the Irrigation District in 1929 along with G. M. Lightle and B. E. Strablow when the 8th Annual Yelm Community Fair book was printed.  We know A. J. Justman served as a Director on the Ditch for 20 years but have no record for the exact dates.  According to the paper published in 1937 Ray Cruikshank was the secretary and manager of the Ditch for the past 6 years so that goes back to 1931.  Mr. D. R. Hughes states he was Chairman of the Board in 1937.
   
Three Directors were voted in for 4 Years at a time.  They hired the superintendent, secretary, ditch walkers, carpenters and all the employees.  The assessment or tax per acres was $3.00 at the first.  In a letter written in 1942 it was mentioned by a Farm Security Administrator that the assessment would have to be raised but did not say how much.

In 1932 with a record producing crop of berries, the growers found themselves facing a situation where the price of cane berries was     considerably below the cost of production.  Many of the settlers out of work and depending upon the berry crop as a sole source income were unable to carry on.

A. J. Justman rented Mr. Harold Wolf’s warehouse for a Berry Receiving station in Yelm.  The farmers would bring their berries to the receiving station for weighing and they received a slip for the amount of berries brought in.  A. J. Justman and his sons and other hired drivers trucked the berries to the Olympia Canning Company.  This was in the 200s.  Art Justman Jr. drove truck from 1939 when he was 17 until after the war in 1945.
   

One year the canneries stopped buying berries.  The Olympia Canning Co. only bought berries that were signed up.  A J Justman found a canning Company in Oregon who would buy the farmers berries and saved the crop for the farmers who otherwise would have lost everything.  They said, “Art we will never forget you for this.”  The one that said it sold to someone else the very next year.

   

In a letter written by Albert Molenaar, a State Water Utilization Technician, states, The Yelm Irrigation District has approximately 3500 acres of irrigable land under its canals and laterals.  Recent estimates in my report on the District’s Irrigation system indicate that…half was actually irrigated in 1942 and acreage in 1943 will be considerably less than in the past season…During the last few months farmers…have quit farming and gone to work in war industries…Of farmers operating in the area only 25% were left by the middle of October 1942…Many retain their homes and just live on the farm.  This exodus of farmers is attributed to high wages in war industries and difficulty in getting labor to harvest the crops.  The main reason, in my opinion, farmers are very poorly suited to farming in the Irrigation District Area.  The number of farm units is reduced from 275 by the census survey in 1939 to 100 units now 1942…The committee members are faced with getting the land that is vacated back into production.  Unless they are successful in their efforts to find operators for the land, a large percentage of the cultivable and irrigable acreage will lie idle in 1943.  This idle land will seriously effect the welfare of the Yelm Irrigation District…because revenue will not be collected from idle land.

In the Yelm area are some 3500 acres of irrigable land of which 2000 acres will lie idle in 1943.

In the past farmers have depended on small acreage of highly intensive and specialty crops, mainly cane berries…Mosaic disease in the canes and several years of low prices for the crops have brought about a great reduction in berries.  The trend is to go toward dairying and a limited diversity of poultry.
   
In the Land Use Report it states, “During the past few years individual landowners as well as the District has been hard hit financially.  79% of the berries were destroyed by mosaic disease.  A careful survey shows 60-70% of the settlers in the irrigation district are receiving some form of public assistance.”

A failure of this District would be a serious matter not only to the inhabitants, but to Thurston County as well.

In 1946 right after the War Mr. Kanff, Jack Conner, manager of the Puget Power in Yelm at that time, and one other man were elected to the Ditch Board.  These men were the ones who raised the Irrigation Tax to $10.00 an acre and spent a lot of money trying to fix up rotting flumes and ailing ditches and put in concrete siphons under the roads.  The directors at that time tried to raise the tax to $20.00 an acre.  The farmers got together with Mr. Harold Brogger of the Bureau of Agricultural Economics and formed a group called the Taxpayer Association.  They put pressure on the Directors so they left the Irrigation Tax at $10.00 an acre.  This was in 1948 and 1949 and Art Justman Jr. remembers it was $6.00 an acre before that.  If people could not pay their Irrigation Tax their land was taken over by the Irrigation District.  They had 2 years to redeem their land or it would be sold to the highest bidder by written bids.  Many people lost their land.

In the last part of 1949 Governor Arthur B. Langlie appointed Arthur J. Justman to close the Irrigation District together with the Department of Conservation and Development.  There was so much opposition to the closing of the Ditch that good friends were on opposite sides.  The town with their small garden plots got their water but the farmers with large acreage faced $10 an acre for 3 years in a row and not getting water on their land.  The town business men who made money off the Irrigation District and the people who were employed wanted to Ditch to continue.
The Director of Conservation and Development told Arthur J Justman that the State could cancel the Bond Issue indebtedness for they had done so for other Irrigation systems in the State, but because of the opposition to closing the District, an extra charge of $10 an acre was assessed to pay of the Bond Issue.

Many could not pay and lost their land.

Bill Goodwin Jr. was the attorney for the closing of the ditch. 

Some slanderous things were published in the Paper and A.J. asked Bill Goodwin, “Should I sue?”  Bill said, “No, Art! We will win them with Love!”

The District operated from 1918 until 1950-32 years.  A J Justman was on the Ditch Board for 20 of those years counting the year it took to close the District.

Sources:    Bureau of Agricultural Economics letter written by Albert Molenaar-State Utilization Technician

        Report of the Yelm Land Use Planning Committee submitted February 1942 concerning the Yelm Irrigation District.
        Members of the Committee:
            A.J. Justman, Chairman
            D.R. Hughes
            Henry Moyer
            George Lanphear
            Ray Cruikshank
            Ww. Goodwin
            James Mosman
            J.M. Hales
            Jack Peugh
            Louis Cochrane
            Jack Harris
            R.S. Sparling
            Chester Reichel
        Agency Representatives
            Extension Service;
            Bureau of Agricultural Economics:
            Farm Security Administration:
            Farm Management Department, State College of Wash.
    Submitted by Arthur J. Justman Jr. and Georgia Justman

Usual & Accustomed Places III – The Depression, The New Deal, & the Indian Reawakening

The relationship between the original inhabitants of Washington and the non-Indians who started arriving in the late 18th century is one of the great ongoing stories of this state’s history. The impact of trade, disease, culture, conflict, and law on Native Americans from this region tells us a lot about our nation and ourselves. The following is an examination of the struggle between Indians and non-Indians over the right to fish for salmon, one of the great natural resources of the Northwest.

PART III – THE DEPRESSION, THE NEW DEAL, & THE INDIAN REAWAKENING

This section of the struggle over fishing in Washington covers the era of the depression and World War II. Both of these events profoundly shaped the course of fishing rights and tribal history in this state.

INITIATIVE 77

Fishing in the state would next be influenced by political events shaped by the forces of the depression that struck the U.S. in the early 1930s. Unemployment in Seattle reached 23% in 1931 where some 12,000 people were without work. Mills all around the state were shutting down or cutting back wages and hours. The 1932 salmon pack (the measurement of canned salmon) was 120,000,000 pounds under that of 1929. Not surprisingly many ideas gained credence for solving this increased lack of work. Also, large businesses, corporations, and the wealthy in general became the targets of the public anger about the lack of work.

In the world of Washington fishing this anger was aimed at the fish wheel and fish trap operators. In the minds of some people these enterprises which relied heavily on technology and required few people to operate were taking jobs away from honest workers. Using the initiative process, backers of Initiative 77 obtained enough signatures on their measure to put it on the ballot in 1934 where it would be up to the public to vote on whether or not to eliminate all fish wheels, traps, beach seines, and set nets from use in the state. The measure also would close certain parts of Puget Sound to all commercial fishing except by Native Americans. The initiative received its strongest support from purse seine operators who were in competition with fish wheel and trap operators. Also, sport fishermen, who had earlier supported the move to make the steelhead a “sport” fish supported the initiative idea.

Proponents of the bill made many arguments in favor of Initiative 77. The following comments come from newspaper articles supporting the initiative. Think carefully about whether you would have believed each argument.

  1. The measure provides for the perpetuation of the salmon fishery and will save Washington’s third largest industry. It will rehabilitate the run of king and silver salmon in Puget Sound as fish traps take the larger share of these species.
  2. It will establish Puget Sound as a sport fishermen’s paradise by the protections offered the two important species of salmon. It will give the great salmon fishing industry back to the people instead of leaving it in the hands of a financially powerful minority.
  3. Purse seine boats . . . in the open waters employ eight men to the boat, whereas each trap employs an average of two men.
  4. [Initiative 77 will bring] hundreds of thousands of dollars to many diversified lines of trade from tourists who now do their salmon fishing in Canada and Alaska because Puget Sound is fished out.
  5. It would enhance property values through the entire 2,000 miles of shoreline on Puget Sound
  6. Trap sites are obtained for a fee of only $50 per year to the state and can be held perpetually.
  7. Give this great natural resource back to the people instead of leaving it in the hands of a powerful financial minority involving large interests of Eastern and California capital.
  8. Initiative No. 77 is a fight between thousands of . . . citizens of this state [and] a mere handful of wealthy fish barons.
  9. It will bring profitable employment to a minimum of 30,000 citizens of this state with runs of salmon built back to the 1913 level. It will permit these 30,000 citizens to share equally in their rightful ownership of the great salmon runs, because these runs belong to all the people, and not a small group of wealthy fish trap owners.

Opponents of the measure didn’t have chance. The measure could not possibly increase salmon sales because the nation was in the midst of a depression. Thirty thousand jobs were not going to appear overnight. Salmon weren’t going to be saved; on the contrary, under Initiative 77 purse seiners and sport fishermen were actually going to catch more. Tourists were not going to flock to this “fishermen’s paradise” because people out of work during a depression don’t go on vacations. Even so, the measure passed overwhelmingly with over 131,000 votes in favor and only 76,000 against.

As originally written the initiative was not to apply to Indian fishing, but within a few years sports clubs started demanding state action against Indians who, in their words, were fishing in “defiance” of the law. This “defiance” was merely the Indians fishing with their traditional methods in accordance with the law which did not regulate them. The sport fishermen went even further stating that the state should arrest all “young bucks” because the Indians “were infringing on state rights. The state is not infringing on the privileges of Indians.” The sport fishermen even turned to the U.S. Congress to prohibit Indian trapping. Sportsmen accused Washington Indians of committing a “depraved and callous slaughter” of salmon and that the tribes should be forced to “observe the principles of conservation.” The sportsmen even argued that Indian fish traps caught more fish in a single haul than sportsmen would catch in the same stream in an entire season.

PROPORTIONAL CATCH OF EACH SALMON SPECIES BY USER GROUP 1936-39

User Group Chinook Coho Chum Sockeye Humpback
Purse Seines 29 61 80 80 79
Gill Nets 58 31 16 5 14
Reef Nets 2 4 * 5 4
Trollers * 1 *
Indians 10 3 3 <1 2
          * Less Than 1
In the Swindell Report on fishing in the state the author wrote:

The measure known as Initiative 77 had as its commendable object, the conservation of the declining fish migrations and, of course, was not primarily directed at the Indian fishery. However, its passage constituted a serious blow to the Indian fishery being carried on at usual and accustomed grounds since due to their extremely limited financial means their gear necessarily must be obtainable at a minimum of expense. Generally speaking, the Indians were unable to finance the purchase of other more expensive gear and operating equipment, the use of which was not entirely outlawed. In order to continue to provide the necessities of life, the Indians, as a result of the above conservation statute, were literally forced to confine their fishing with such gear to reservation waters. The fact that such was the situation led to considerable agitation in the Pacific Northwest and especially in the state of Washington looking to the further curtailment of the Indians’ commercial fishery.

During these decades there were dozens of individual dramas as tribes appealed to the government for fairness or as individual Indians continued to fish and were arrested. One of the latter was Sampson Tulee who, in the state of Washington’s eyes, used an outlawed dip net and was also fishing without a license when he was arrested in 1939. He was accused and convicted of violating state law in the county court and lost his appeal at the state supreme court. From the state Supreme Court he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court claiming that the Yakama Treaty of 1855 protected his right to fish without following state law.

In its 1942 decision in Tulee vs. Washington the Supreme Court held that the treaties between the tribes and the federal government remained in effect after Washington became a state and that Sampson Tulee did not require a state fishing license in order to fish off reservation. The state had argued that a fishing license was one method they used to protect and conserve salmon, but the court stated that there were better ways to accomplish this goal. The court wrote:

Even though this method may be both convenient and, in its general impact fair, it acts upon the Indians as a charge for exercising the very right their ancestors intended to reserve. We believe that such an exaction of fees (a fishing license) as a prerequisite to the enjoyment of fishing in the “usual and accustomed places” cannot be reconciled with a fair construction of the treaty. We therefore hold the state statute invalid as applied in this case.

But earlier in this decision the court wrote that “the imposition of fees is not indispensable to the effectiveness of a state conservation program.” This meant that court might tolerate other types of state restrictions placed on off-reservation Indian fishing. This was more clearly spelled out when the justices wrote: “the treaty leaves the State with the power to impose on Indians equally with others such restrictions of a purely regulatory nature concerning the time and the manner of fishing outside the reservations necessary for the conservation of fish.” The state of Washington would use this latter language as a justification for continued restrictions on Indian fishing in the state, and the stage was set for the next round of the fishing conflict of Washington.

CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO – THE THIRTIES AND FORTIES

The administration of Franklin Roosevelt from 1933-45 was a pivotal point for Indian tribes in this nation. Under the Wheeler-Howard Act tribes were encouraged to organize themselves, write their own tribal constitutions, and increasingly govern themselves. Native Americans were brought into some of the New Deal work programs like the Civilian Conservation Corps. Others found jobs in the Bureau of Indian Affairs or the new tribal governments that were established, and more Native Americans went to college. With the U.S. entry into World War II in 1941 much of the money dried up for the above programs, but the experience of World War II altered the consciousness of Indians who participated in the war effort. Nationwide 25,000 Indians served in the armed forces and another 50,000 worked in the defense industry. As in the case of African-Americans who served in similar roles, these Native Americans would act as agents of change with their local communities.

This new consciousness, however, ran headlong into renewed federal efforts to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American culture. During the Eisenhower Administration of the 1950s a policy of tribal “termination” was proposed. According to this policy, the government would put an end to the legal idea of a tribe. Reservations would no longer exist. Property and other assets owned by tribes would simply be divided up among the individual Indians. And Indians, who once were part of a tribe and tribal law, would now be governed only by the laws of the cities, counties and states in which they lived. Two tribes were actually “terminated” under this policy: the Menominee tribe in Wisconsin and the Klamath tribe in Oregon. Most Indians and tribes were shocked and angry at this idea. Even though the US government had broken many treaties and promises in the past, tribes knew that, if they were terminated, the state governments would treat them even worse. Even the U.S. Supreme Court had once identified the states as the “deadliest enemies” of Native Americans. When looking back at the history of fishing in this state, the Indians of Washington could only feel pessimistic about their future under a policy of termination. Termination, however, did not become standard policy and eventually was killed by President Nixon, but its unintended result was to help spur Indians to reassert their rights and tribal identities even more. In Washington this would take place in the streams and rivers of the state.

Women’s Clubs

The remoteness of a town like Yelm caused a need for the women to socialize with each other. The harsh lifestyle that they had to endure was too much without some kind of diversion from their work. Clubs provided the women in Yelm with a channel through which they could accomplish both these things.

Women desired to make lasting changes that they felt were necessary in society. They yearned to demonstrate their ability to be as effective and important as their male counterparts. The need to improve themselves was also a concern. The clubs that women organized often paid strict attention to parliamentary procedure. With parliamentary procedure they proved they were capable of being organized as well as executing programs and decisions with efficiency.

The main focus of the clubs was to better the community. Several clubs were founded solely upon the desire to improve Yelm while others were created to support an interest or hobby yet still held community service as important. The Garden Club, for example, participated in many floral competitions and shows but also took it upon themselves to make wreaths for each veteran’s grave and to landscape parts of the community. The Civic Club was the most service minded of the clubs in Yelm. Some of its activities were garbage disposal, making sidewalks and courtesy ramps, clean up days, erecting signs, playground improvement and landscaping. Another important service was provided by the Orthopedic Auxiliary. This Club provided care for the children in the community by treating them for their bone ailments, which often resulted in full recovery.

Patriotism was proudly displayed by the Navy Mothers of Yelm. These women volunteered countless hours at the recruiting booth, provided Christmas parties and meals for local troops and held bond drives. One of the most successful drives brought in six thousand dollars.

Women put a large amount of effort into each of the clubs that they founded or participated in. Women were effective in initiating and carrying out major civic programs in an organized manner. This was a quality of their work that proved they had the same business capabilities as men and were able to administer them. The good that resulted in the town of Yelm was a landmark to the women’s good character, hard working mentality and desire to give to society.

By Kara Lowe (2002)

(Source: The Story of Yelm: The Little Town With the Big History, 1848-1948)

Yelm and the New Deal

The sudden depression that followed the “Roaring Twenties” sent the United States spiraling in to a state of complete uncertainty. Instead of the average citizen having more time and money than they knew how to spend, they now had almost no money and spent their time looking for whatever available jobs they could find. Because of these unexpected and horrific circumstances, the government was in need of some adequate solutions, and fast. The result was the launching of the New Deal by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This program dealt with many of the problems facing the nation on both an agricultural and industrial level. Thanks to the New Deal, the nation was soon well on it’s way back to the comfortable lifestyle that it once knew. Surprising as it may be, our little town of Yelm did not escape joining the nation in this particular crisis, nor was it left out of the programs that helped this nation recover.

Yelm experienced all the mainstream problems that plagued the nation during the depression. Unemployment was obviously high, and even those who were employed made very meager amounts to live on. Bob Wolf’s family owned the local grocery store and he said that they extended enormous amounts of credit as well as being involved in “…bartering and exchanging food, but not a lot of cash was involved.” His mother wrote in his baby book, “The banks have crashed. We’ve lost everything that we had in the banks…we’ll never get that back.” It was a time of despair for the entire country and the situation was no different in the prairie town of Yelm.

The economy of Yelm during the depression was certainly reflective of the country as a whole. The decline in gross returns of the prominent berry industry that was a major economic influence in the district is evidence of the crisis as it occurred in Yelm. Despite the fact that in 1931 the district was estimated to have produced twice as many berries as in 1928, the gross return in ‘31 was notably less than the $35,000 revenue from ’28, as it produced a mere $30,000. Furthermore, property tax rates reflect the declining Yelm economy as well. The following chart shows the funds received by Yelm High School from levies on property taxes from the beginning of the depression to the very height of it.

1929 $22,875
1930 $25,225
1931 $20,145
1932 $21,354
1933 $21,170
1934 $15,480
1935 $16,769
1936 $14,536

As you can see the funding dropped dramatically over the first few years of the decade. That decline compounded with the fact that the needed funds for the year 1936 were approximately $15,605, and the district actually received $14,536 led to the demands of the superintendent for a new levy in ‘37. In all actuality, the fact was that property values had severely declined as a result of the national depression and there simply was no money for the schools, or for anything else.

The New Deal brought a new sense of hope for many Americans. Early New Deal developments included the National Industrial Recovery Act in 1933. This set new standards for labor such as a minimum wage of $.30-$.40/hour, a standard work week set at 35-40 hours/week, and laws prohibiting child labor. This was great news for those who were fortunate enough to be employed. The Public Works Administration monitored and stabilized government spending. This was a helpful development considering that many theories contribute the unstable spending of the government to the numerous causes of the depression. The Glass-Steagal Act set up the FDIC and guaranteed up to $2500 of money invested in banks, which would prevent many tragic cases like that of the Wolf family in the future. All of these developments were fundamental in restoring faith in the government in its future endeavors. However, the people realized that, while in the future these developments would be incredibly stabilizing, the problem remained that people were poor, starving and in need of help right now.

The result was the series of work relief programs that would follow during the larger part of the 1930’s. Many of the programs implemented were focused on the immediate recovery of the economy. The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was a program that focused on re-growing and preserving the forest and was geared toward young men in somewhat urbanized areas. The CCC was present in Yelm in the form of a camp on the outskirts of Rainier. This site was funded by the government and employed a number of men from the area. In 1936 the farmers in the Yelm area were offered a chance for rehabilitation. Farmers were allowed to apply to the County Relief Agency for “temporary subsistence grants” until they could get their farms back at a profitable level. Also offered was a way to stabilize their farms and make them profitable by adjusting their debts and giving them loans for the goods needed to do it. Another program that was implemented in the early 30’s was the National Youth Administration (NYA) whose primary concern was the education of the youth of America. They sought to provide the necessary funds for students to continue the pursuit of their education. In Yelm the NYA presented many opportunities for the small farm town where children were needed to maintain the crops during this time of crisis. In fact, in 1935 the Nisqually Valley News reported that the government would be providing Yelm High School with $100 a month which would be given out to students whom the district felt were worthy and in need of it. Any student over the age of 16 was able to receive up to $6 per month and were required to do some type of designated job in order to earn the much needed money. Many students were able to remain in school because of this program in Yelm. Other types of relief programs available in Yelm and the rest of the nation included Mother’s Pensions and welfare programs with very specific income requirements. These programs helped tremendously in the area of Yelm; however, the biggest aid during the depression came from the many government-funded jobs that were implemented by the Works Progress Administration (WPA).

The WPA was a larger version of the preceding Civil Works Administration (CWA). The CWA was a government-funded program that provided civilians with employment on government projects such as roads, bridges, dams, etc. The much broader WPA was apparent in many cases in Yelm. The government-funded Yelm Irrigation project, which focused on increasing the capacity of the main canal, was estimated to have employed around 25 men for 10 months in 1935. In November of that same year the government provided necessary funds for the $16,500 Yelm creek project. The goal of this project was to decrease the amount of flooding that was prevalent during the winter as well as providing work for 20-40 men over a period of 6 months. The $9,350 Yelm city streets project was commenced closed to the same time. This project was designed to employ 12 men to finish making concrete sidewalks on Yelm’s main avenue and to improve the gravel sidewalks on the side streets of Yelm. All of these programs were essential in the recovery of the Yelm economy and the national crisis as a whole.

The impact of the depression on the economy of the United States is undeniable. The vast decline in employment, income, and the standard of living portrayed the immense crisis that plagued the nation and that certainly did not exclude Yelm. The New Deal programs implemented by Roosevelt were incredibly helpful in directing the nation toward recovery. In Yelm, programs such as the CCC, the NYA, and the many opportunities for welfare assistance were particularly helpful. Overall, though, the WPA was absolutely imparative in sending the city of Yelm back toward recovery. The experiences of Yelm with the depression and the New Deal were certainly reflective of the experiences of the nation as a whole.

The Thirties – Yelm Schools During the Great Depression

The Thirties: Yelm Schools During the Great Depression

Introduction: The story of Yelm schools in this era is revealed though the school board minutes of the early part of the decade as well as selections from the annuals of the time.

Yelm Schools in the Thirties: The Depression and a Fire

School Budgets of County Are Markedly Lower (1932)

Teacher Salaries in Yelm, 1930-1932

1930’s – Yelm Football Records

1932 Annual

1933 Annual

1935 Annual

1937 Annual

1938 Annual

1939 Annual